SpletMhlongo v S; Nkosi v S 2015 (2) SACR 323 (CC) Donrich W Thaldar. ... (SCA) in S v Ndhlovu 2002 (2) SACR 325 (SCA). The Ndhlovu rule entailed that an extra-curial admission, but not a confession, by one co-accused is admissible as evidence against another co-accused if required by the interests of justice. The interests of justice in turn ...
South Africa: Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
SpletM Monye ‘The legal implications of S v Ndhlovu and Litako v S on the South African law of hearsay evidence: A critical overview’ (2016) SACJ Vol. 29 No. 3 308 at 309. Also refer to S v Ndhlovu 2002 (2) SACR 325 (SCA); Litako & Others v S 2014 (3) ALL SA 138 (SCA); Mhlongo v S; Nkosi v S 2015 (2) SACR 323 (CC) and Splet1 S v Mhlongo 2016 (2) SACR 611 (SCA) ... 3 S v Romer 2011 (2) SACR 153 (SCA) para 22-23. 6 [14] Typically some delays seem to have been at the instance of the State and others at the instance of the appellant. Primarily the appellant remained in custody because his three bail applications failed. Even if there were delays this court said in features of the maxillae include
Mhlongo v S (140/2016) [2016] ZASCA 152; 2016 (2) …
SpletIn S v Mhlongo 2016 (2) SACR 611 (SCA) para 9, the Supreme Court of Appeal emphasised that the fixing of a non-parole period was part of a criminal trial and that in accordance … SpletS v Mhlongo 2016 2 SACR 611 (SCA) par 23 - Mocumie JA held that the absence of a victim impact statement about the harm suffered by a 27-year-old rape victim (after having been … SpletDiscuss the schedules 5, 6 & 7 and how this affects the onus in a bail application; STUDY THEME 7: Indictments and Charges (Chapter 14 of the Code - CPA) (a) Gener al S v Mhlongo 2016 (2) SACR 611 (SCA) para 15 only – minimum sentence Sv Legoa 2003(1) SACR 13 (SCA) para 21 et seq – detail in charge sheet Theophilopoulos – ch.13 p. 197 ... features of the mandible